Latest News

TAKE A LOOK AT SOME OF OUR ARTICLES

When will the changes in the Employment Rights Bill happen? What employers need to know

The Employment Rights Bill is in the final stages of its journey through Parliament and the Government has published a roadmap setting out when its provisions are expected to come into force. This is good news for employers, as many of the bigger changes in the bill are delayed, which will give them more time…

[ READ MORE ] from When will the changes in the Employment Rights Bill happen? What employers need to know

Bias in, bias out: how artificial intelligence (AI) recruitment can cost you

Scenario Let us imagine a scenario. Victoria, a senior recruiter at a healthcare charity, is proud of her organisation’s progressive values. Pressed for time, she signs off on a new AI-powered tool that screens CVs and ranks candidates by ‘fit’. The provider says it uses anonymised data and ‘learns’ from successful hires.  So far, so…

[ READ MORE ] from Bias in, bias out: how artificial intelligence (AI) recruitment can cost you

How should you run a disciplinary process when the employee is clearly unwell?

You have serious misconduct allegations. The employee in question is signed off with stress and depression. What now? Do you push on, pause, or tweak the process? The recent High Court decision in Woodhead v WTTV Ltd is a cautionary tale for HR. While unusual (it was a personal injury claim, not a Tribunal case),…

[ READ MORE ] from How should you run a disciplinary process when the employee is clearly unwell?

How should you avoid age discrimination when selecting for redundancy?

You have to make cuts. The restructuring is happening. The selection criteria are ready, complete with performance, conduct, and… qualifications. One person does not have a degree. They are also the oldest in the team. You score them lower, they are selected for redundancy, and you move on. Or so you think. What happened? That…

[ READ MORE ] from How should you avoid age discrimination when selecting for redundancy?

The ‘all reasonable steps’ defence – it can be done!

Case: Campbell v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2025] EAT 42 This case provides a rare example of an employer successfully relying on the ‘all reasonable steps’ defence against a discrimination claim. What happened? During a workplace dispute, a white employee made a racially abusive comment to a black union representative. The representative claimed…

[ READ MORE ] from The ‘all reasonable steps’ defence – it can be done!

Closing the gaps: ethnicity and disability pay reporting ahead

What is new? Under the proposed Equality (Race and Disability) Bill, employers with 250 or more employees will be legally required to publish: Ethnicity and disability pay gaps (mean and median hourly pay). Bonus differentials. Proportion of employees receiving bonuses. Workforce composition by ethnicity and disability. This marks a significant evolution from gender pay gap…

[ READ MORE ] from Closing the gaps: ethnicity and disability pay reporting ahead

HR consultants not liable for employer’s decision to dismiss

Case: Handa v Station Hotel (Newcastle) Ltd [2025] EAT 62 The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has provided a thoughtful judgment that reassures external HR professionals that they can complete investigations and disciplinary processes without inheriting liability for dismissal decisions. What happened? Mr Handa, formerly a director, blew the whistle on alleged financial irregularities. Shortly after,…

[ READ MORE ] from HR consultants not liable for employer’s decision to dismiss

Right to work checks: the gig economy gets caught in the net

The headline The Home Office has announced that right to work (RTW) checks will be extended to cover gig economy workers, zero-hours contractors, and workers supplied via third-party platforms. This represents a substantial expansion of the illegal working regime and imposes new burdens on sectors that traditionally rely on informal labour supply models. What is…

[ READ MORE ] from Right to work checks: the gig economy gets caught in the net

Supreme Court clarifies ‘Sex’ in Equality Act 2010

The Supreme Court has ruled that ‘man’, ‘woman’, and ‘sex’ under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) refer to biological sex, not acquired gender. The legal meaning of sex is now firmly anchored to biology, not gender recognition certificates. The ruling will reshape how businesses approach equality, recruitment, and single-sex services. Background The case arose…

[ READ MORE ] from Supreme Court clarifies ‘Sex’ in Equality Act 2010